Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 Misc. 2d 950

Brinkman v. Moskowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1962-12-24

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1962-12-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2008

9 state decisions

4019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1It is undisputed that defendant Moskowitz had notice of the assignment to plaintiff, for medical services rendered, of a portion of the proceeds of his client’s claim for personal injuries. Consequently, in paying out moneys in disregard of such assignment, he is liable to plaintiff for the resulting damage. (Continental Purchasing Co. v. Van Raalte Co., 251 App. Div. 151.)

¶2The affidavit submitted in support of the defendant Allstate’s motion for summary judgment fails to establish that the cause of action asserted against it has no merit.

¶3The order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Moskowitz should be unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and the matter directed to be set down for an assessment of damages.

¶4The order, insofar as it grants summary judgment to both defendants and judgment entered thereon, should be unanimously reversed, with $5 costs to plaintiff against each defendant, and motion for summary judgment by defendant Allstate Insurance Company denied.

¶5Concur — Hart, Di Gtovanna and Brown, JJ.

¶6Order reversed, etc.

/38/misc2d/950 · .json · Public domain