Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 MO 245 - Lapsley v. McKinstry

Lapsley v. McKinstry’s Empirical Analysis

1866

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1959
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1959

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

301866187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mott v. Hicks · Tippets v. Walker · Randall v. Van Vechten · McClellan v. Parker · Byars v. Doores' Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In cases of officers acting for and on behalf of the government, the general rule is, that they are not bound personally by contracts made in an official capacity even though they would be by the terms of the contract, if it were an agency of a private nature — Sto. Agency § 302. This rule is established from motives of public policy. But although this is the general rule in relation to public agents, yet it is founded upon a mere presumption, and is liable to be rebutted by circumstances which clearly establish an intention between the parties to the contract to create and rely upon a personal responsibility on the part of a public agent; for there is nothing in the general principles or policy of the law which forbids an agent from waiving his official immunity, and making himself personally responsible. Id. § 306”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.