Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 MOAPP 239 - Meeker v. Straat

Meeker v. Straat’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
December 1965
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1965

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions

60188918901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Titterington v. Hooker · Hammons v. Renfrow · Ensworth v. Curd · McAllister v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This decree cannot stand. Suits contemplate adversary parties, although amicable suits may be brought to determine the respective rights of the parties thereto. When a suit is brought with a view of affecting the rights of third parties, and it is apparent that that is its sole object, the suit ceases to be adversary and becomes collusive. No court should lend its aid to such a proceeding, least of all a court of equity. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.