Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 NC 347 - Smith v. . Brittain

Smith v. . Brittain’s Empirical Analysis

1844

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2021

6 state decisions

301844185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. . Beeman · Markland Adm. v. . Crump · Den Ex Dem. Belk v. Love

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an assignee stands absolutely in the place of his assignor, and it is. . . as if the contract had been originally made with the assignee, upon precisely the same terms as with the original parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the assignee stands absolutely in the place of his assignor[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.