Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

38 N.C. App. 389

In re Boyles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1978

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1978-10-17

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2009

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-10-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ARNOLD, Judge.

¶1N.C. G.S. § 122-58.11 sets out the procedures for involuntary commitment rehearings. As this was not the first rehearing, subsection (e) applies: “Fifteen days before the end of the . . . commitment period . . . the chief of medical services of the facility *390shall . . . evaluate the condition of each respondent, and if he determines that a respondent is in continued need of hospitalization . . . shall so notify the respondent, his counsel, and the clerk of superior court. . . Respondent contends that this 15-day period has the effect of a statute of limitations, so that a proceeding brought on less notice must be dismissed. We disagree. Dismissal is too drastic, and unless respondent can show some prejudice the proper action would be to continue the proceeding until ample notice has been given.

¶2Affirmed.

Judges VAUGHN and WEBB concur.
/38/ncapp/389 · .json · Public domain