Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 N.C. App. 494 - Harris v. Ashley

38 N.C. App. 494 - Harris v. Ashley’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Smith · 3 N.C. App. 175 - EAST COAST OIL COMPANY v. Fair · Combs v. Combs · Combs v. Combs · Rogers v. . Timberlake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[i]t is well-settled law in North Carolina that the party is entitled to relief which the allegations in the pleadings will justify.... It is not necessary that there be a prayer for relief or that the prayer for relief contain a correct statement of the relief to which the party is entitled.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is entitled to recover the amount by which he has enhanced the value of the property”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “entitled to relief which the allegations in the pleadings will justify[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.