Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 NEV 25 - Howard v. Wright

Howard v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
9
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Hester v. Sawyers (1937), Larue v. Kosich (1947)

38 state decisions

9019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. England · Anthony v. Kennard Building Co. · 22 Cal. App. 289 - Tarpey v. Veith · Reid v. Garnett · Clay v. Penzel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' “A right of way by prescription can only be acquired by a user which is neither expressly nor impliedly licensed or permissive. It must be adverse and hostile to the owner of •the servient estate, and' must be under a claim of right so expressed as to charge the owner of the servient estate with knowledge thereof. . . . “Nothing less than an adverse user, under claim of legal right, will perfect an easement by occupancy for the statutory time. A use acquired merely by consent, permission, or indulgence of the owner of the servient estate can never ripen into a prescriptive right, unless the user of the dominant estate expressly abandons and denies his right under license or permission, and openly declares his right to be adverse to the owner of the servient estate. (Hurt v. Adams, 86 Mo. App. 73 ) . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.