Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 NJEQ 234 - Kirkpatrick v. Corning

Kirkpatrick v. Corning’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1942
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1942

3 state decisions

101884189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the silence of the defendant in the suit was equivalent to a consent that the property should be treated as their property, and it would be inequitable now to allow them to object.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.