Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 N.M. 471 - Mayfield v. Crowdus

Mayfield v. Crowdus’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
May 1977
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 1977 · most notably Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co. (1948), Clinkscales v. Carver (1943)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

16019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Union Pacific R. · Comfort v. Penner · 202 Mo. App. 564 - Calhoon v. D. C. & F. Mining Co. · 225 Mo. App. 932 - Roberts v. Wilson · Lawe v. City of Seattle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not consider it necessary to determine whether or not section 61 of the traffic ordinance is contrary to the motor vehicle code or the constitutional inhibition above quoted. The stop sign had been maintained and renewed at that intersection since May, 1928. Presumably, it was erected and maintained by legally constituted authority; but whether so or not is of no particular moment, as it was at least a de facto warning sign. Whether it was a de jure warning sign or not is not necessary to determine. It was maintained for the safety of traffic. Travelers upon public highways are not expected to first ascertain and determine whether such signs are established in strict compliance with law before respecting them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.