Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 N.M. 529 - Atler v. Stolz

Atler v. Stolz’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 1973
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 1973

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

6019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Romero v. Hopewell · Martin v. Battey · Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co. v. Lermuseaux · Catron v. Gallup Fire Brick Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The most that appellant could demand was the establishment of her lien. Except for the purpose of letting her lien in, no case was made for disturbing the several transactions among the defendants."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.