Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Ohio App. 3d 105 - State v. Ginocchio

38 Ohio App. 3d 105 - State v. Ginocchio’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State ex rel. White v. Junkin (1997), 93 Ohio App. 3d 153 - In Re Mitchell (1994)

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

18019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tripodo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. the case caption and number; “2. a designation as a decision or judgment entry or both; “3. a clear pronouncement of the court’s judgment, including the plea, the verdict or findings, sentence, and the court’s rationale if the entry is combined with a decision or opinion; “4. the judge's signature; and “5. a time stamp indicating the filing of the judgment with the clerk for journalization.” Id. at 106 , 526 N.E.2d at 1367-1368 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea, the verdict or findings, and the sentence. If the defendant is found not guilty or for any other reason is entitled to be discharged, judgment shall be entered accordingly. The judgment shall be signed by the judge and entered by the clerk.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] document not labeled `judgment' or `judgment entry,' nor unequivocally intended to be a judgment does not constitute a `judgment' in the formal sense. This is * * * true where no separate document is ever filed by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.