Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Ohio App. 3d 113 - Friday v. Rice

38 Ohio App. 3d 113 - Friday v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 29 Ohio App. 3d 237 - Semenas v. Republic Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rule 12 of the Supreme Court Rules of Superintendence for Courts of Common Pleas sets forth the parameters for videotaped testimony in evidence in the common pleas courts. Section (D) discusses the costs of videotaped proceedings and, in particular, C.P.Sup.R. 12(D)(1)(c) states: ‘The expense of playing the videotape recording at trial shall be borne by the court.’ Given the clear and unambiguous language of C.P.Sup.R. 12(D)(1)(c), we must conclude that the trial court properly should have assessed the costs of playing the videotaped deposition not to plaintiff, but to the court itself.” Friday at 113 , 526 N.E.2d at 1103 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.