Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Ohio App. 3d 74 - Matuszewski v. Pancoast

38 Ohio App. 3d 74 - Matuszewski v. Pancoast’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2009

6 state decisions

20198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zimmern v. United States · 75 Ohio App. 220 - Levy v. Foley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence that a document or data compilation, in any form, (a) is in such condition as to create no suspicion concerning its authenticity, (b) was in a place where it, if authentic, would likely be, and (c) has been in existence twenty years or more at the time it is offered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.