Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 OHIOST2D 132 - Walters v. Griffith

Walters v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2025

22 state decisions

80197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is a clear constitutional right to a jury trial in civil law suits. See Section 5, Article I, Ohio Constitution; Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. The right to a jury trial may not be impaired, but it 'may be subject to moderate and reasonable regulation.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the failure of a party to make the deposit specified by Rule 3 within the ten-day period after filing the jury demand constitutes a waiver of trial by jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “moderate and reasonable regulations of the right of trial by jury * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.