Kauder v. Kauder’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

61 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In addition to establishing the 30 day period for appeal, App. R. 4(A) provides the exclusive means by which the running of that time may be suspended. The operation of the rule may be tolled by either the filing of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, pursuant to Civ. R. 50(B), or the filing of a motion for new trial under Civ. R. 59. Appellant’s ‘motion for reconsideration’ manifestly is neither. “Appellant’s attempt to equate that motion with a motion for a new trial is of no avail, nor is her argument that the de novo nature of the court’s reconsideration transformed the motion which triggered it into a motion for a new trial. App. R. 4(A) is precise in its requirements,.and appellant’s possible reliance to her detriment upon an informal local practice, although unfortunate, cannot alter the operation of that Rule. Her failure to conform to App. R. 4(A) rendered null the ‘reconsideration’ and the resulting journal entry of April 10, 1973, and the Court of Appeals properly granted the motion to dismiss the appeal.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 41 Ohio App. 2d 251 - North Royalton Education Ass'n v. North Royalton Bd. of Education · Bond v. Airway Development Corp.