Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 OHIOST3D 112 - Mitseff v. Wheeler

Mitseff v. Wheeler’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2,030
cited by 2,030 later decisions
8
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2,030 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,030 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Dresher v. Burt (1996), 87 Ohio App. 3d 704 - Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993)

2,030 state decisions

714019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Grieco v. Meachum · Massaro v. Vernitron Corp.

Cited together with Dresher v. Burt · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Temple v. Wean United, Inc. · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,030 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] party seeking summary judgment must specifically delineate the basis upon which summary judgment is sought in order to allow the opposing party a meaningful opportunity to respond.”
    90 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * the moving party bears the initial responsibility of informing the trial court of the basis for the motion, and identifying those portions of the record which demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of fact or material element of the nonmoving party's claim.”
    89 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the nonmoving party then has a reciprocal burden under Civ.R. 56(E) to set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial, and if the nonmovant does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against the nonmoving party.”
    45 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.