Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 OHIOST3D 69 - Sharp v. Union Carbide Corp.

Sharp v. Union Carbide Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Hyle v. Porter (2008), Kimble v. Kimble (2002)

45 state decisions

14019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Aragon · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Mathews v. De Castro · Irvine v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a particular term employed in a statute is not defined, it will be accorded its plain, everyday meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.