Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Okla. 388 - Lee v. Lee

Lee v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1942
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1942

5 state decisions

201913192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Adams · Ecker v. Ecker · Pauly v. Pauly · Ford v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A substantial failure of a husband to provide suitably for his wife’s support when he is able to do so is gross neglect of duty, entitling the wife to divorce.” '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.