Stokes v. John Crompton Co.

Decided February 26, 1909

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1909-02-26

Appeal, No. 234, Oct. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1907, No. 4,309, dismissing bill in equity in case of George E. Stokes v. The John Crompton Company. Bill in equity for an account. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.

Affirmed · Decided 1909-02-26

¶1Opinion by

Orlady, J,,

¶2After a careful review of the testimony taken in the court below, we feel that the trial judge was fully warranted in dismissing the plaintiff's bill.

¶3The real question involved in the case is purely a question of fact growing out of the disputed testimony of the plaintiff arid *475the person with whom he alleges he made his contract to bind the defendant company.

¶4No good purpose would be served by reviewing the testimony, there being in our judgment sufficient competent testimony to warrant the conclusion that the plaintiff's right to an accounting is against Alonzo W. Platt, and to him he must look.

¶5The judgment is affirmed.