Moberg v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2003
1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nolin v. Pearson · Humphrey v. Pope · Kennedy v. Garrigan · Paulson v. Langness
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is clear therefore that the injuries done to one in his person, within the meaning of the above section of the Constitution, and the loss or harm suffered in person, within the meaning of section 2287, C.C., include injury to one's personal rights as well as physical injuries to the person. So that, but for the question of coverture, the present action is fully warranted by statute. But by section 105, C.C. (now SDC 14.0207), the disability of coverture, so far as the present action is concerned, was entirely removed. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Said section 32 does not purport to assert that the rights of personal relation may not forbid other things than those mentioned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in this territory there is no common law in any case where the law is declared by the codes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.