Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 So. 2d 802 - Hooper v. Harper

38 So. 2d 802 - Hooper v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1965
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Central Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Oilfield Supply & Scrap Material Co. · State Ex Rel. Sutton v. Caldwell · Perez v. Meraux · Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters · Babst v. Hartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * It is conclusively established in our jurisprudence that a ‘motion to strike’ has no place in our pleading and practice. Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., 14 So.2d 494 ; Atchley v. Horne, La.App., 13 So.2d 75 ; Central Savings Bank & Trust Company v. Oil Field Supply & Scrap Material Company, La.App., 12 So.2d 815 ; Id., 202 La. 787 , 12 So.2d 819 ; Perez v. Meraux, 195 La. 987 , 197 So. 683 ; State ex rel. Sutton et al. v. Caldwell, 195 La. 507 , 197 So. 214 ; Babst v. Hartz et al., 161 La. 427 , 108 So. 871 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Conceding the well established, proposition that a tenant is not privileged to attack the title of his lessor, our examination of the proceedings does not sustain a finding that this is the basis of the defense.” .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.