38 So. 3d 212 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wheat v. United States · 704 So. 2d 169 - Foster v. State · 920 So. 2d 1241 - Myers v. Siegel · 941 So. 2d 1233 - Baron v. Baron · 975 So. 2d 431 - Neal v. Swaby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Brown had little to no opportunity to raise this issue prior to this hearing because only two months had passed since his arrest. Also, the record suggests he may only have been in court one prior time, at his first appearance. The trial court made no finding that the basis for his motion was “dilatory tactics.” And although the trial court held that the case had “been outstanding long enough,” this record does not set forth any possible prejudice or injustice to the State had the trial court granted a continuance so early in the proceedings. In fact, the State raised no objection to Mr. Brown’s request.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.