KRAUTHEIM v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 17 So. 3d 275 - Sheppard v. State · 846 So. 2d 660 - Garcia v. State · 869 So. 2d 695 - Iaconetti v. State · Garcia v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc. · 835 So. 2d 402 - Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to withdraw plea is a critical stage of the proceedings at which a de fendant is entitled to be present and to have counsel represent him.... ... [0]nce it becomes clear that a defendant and his counsel are in an adversarial relationship with respect to the defendant’s entry of his plea, the defendant is entitled to the appointment of conflict-free counsel to represent him and to assist him with respect to his motion to withdraw plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kegler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.