Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 SW2D 173 - Brown v. Hempkins

Brown v. Hempkins’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1933
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Astugueville v. Loustaunau · Bell v. Ramirez · 54 Tex. Civ. App. 1 - Stringfellow v. Braselton · 43 Tex. Civ. App. 434 - Goodbar & Co. v. Bloom · 46 Tex. Civ. App. 534 - Rotan Grocery Co. v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The distinction between a mortgage of land and a conditional sale thereof is clearly stated by our Supreme Court in Astugueville v. Loustaunau, 61 Tex. 233 , 238, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Stayton, from which we quote as follows: `A mortgage "is a security for a debt, while a conditional sale is a purchase for a price paid, or to be paid, to become absolute on a particular event, or a purchase accompanied by an agreement to resell upon particular terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “3 — 26 — 29 Willie Brown: You have today given me deed to 2 acres of land out of the S. M. Durrett Survey. I agree to deed this property back to you within sixty days upon your payment to me of the sum of $30.00 with 10% interest on same from March 26, 1929. Yours truly, H. L. Hempkins.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.