Lane v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1941
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on George v. Hesse · Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co. · Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co. · Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co. · Hubb Diggs Co. v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the bill of exceptions * * * does not disclose, either that there was no evidence to justify the argument, or that there was no argument on the part of the opposing counsel to provoke it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pfeuffer v. Haas“so vicious and prejudicial in its nature as that the effect thereof, if any, upon the jury, was not removed by the court's instruction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pfeuffer v. Haas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.