Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 SW3D 200 - Barnett v. Network Solutions, Inc.

Barnett v. Network Solutions, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 42nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute · Paul Business Systems, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. · Mitsui Co Inc v. Mira M/v · G-W-L, Inc. v. Robichaux

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We also disagree with [plaintiffs] claim that the forum selection clause was placed in the registration agreement only to discourage legitimate legal claims. Even though NSI does not have the burden on this issu^, the record reveals that there were legitimate rea^ sons for including the forum selection clause in the contract. .NSI has received more that 6,000,000 registration applications from throughout the world. Without a forum selection provision, NSI could be sued in forums, throughout the world. Furthermore, because NSI charged only $35 per registration, the forum selection clause was a reasonable way to keep the price of the service low and to eliminate uncertainties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “By the very nature of the electronic format of the contract, Barnett had to scroll through that portion of the contract containing the forum selection clause before he accepted its terms.... It was Barnett’s responsibility to read the electronically-presented contract, and he cannot complain if he did not do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.