Bauer v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

38 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Unless otherwise indicated, the court from time to time after considering all relevant factors including the financial resources of both parties, the merits of the case and the actions of the parties during the pendency of the action, may order a party to pay a reasonable amount for the cost to the other party of maintaining or defending any proceeding pursuant to sections 452.300 to 452.415 and for attorney’s fees, including sums for legal services rendered and costs incurred prior to the commencement of the proceeding and after entry of a final judgment.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sullivan v. Sullivan · Williams v. Williams

2. “1) The wishes of the child’s parents as to custody and the proposed parenting plan submitted by both parties; 2) The needs of the child for a frequent, continuing and meaningful relationship with both parents and the ability and willingness of parents to actively perform their functions as mother and father for the needs of the child; 3) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with parents, siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s, best interests; 4) Which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with the other parent; 5) The child’s adjustment to the child’s home, school, and community; 6) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved, including any history of abuse of any individuals involved ... 7) The intention of either parent to relocate the principal residence of the child; and 8) The wishes of a child as to the child’s custodian ....”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. T.S.I. v. A.L.(C.)B. · DeFreece v. DeFreece

3. “If the parties have not agreed to a custodial arrangement, or the court determines such arrangement is not in the best interest of the child, the court shall include a written finding in the judgment or order based on the public policy in subsection 4 of this section and each of the factors listed in subdivisions (1) to (8) of subsection 2 of this section detailing the specific relevant factors that made a particular arrangement in the best interest of the child. If a proposed custodial arrangement is rejected by the court, the court shall include a written finding in the judgment or order detailing the specific relevant factors resulting in the rejection of such arrangement.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Paden v. Paden · Morse v. Morse