Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 U.S. 464 - Burton v. Smith

Burton v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

38 U.S. 464 · 1839

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2015 · most notably United States v. Bess (1958), Michigan v. United States (1943)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

1101839184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mutual Assurance Society v. Stanard · Dawson v. Moons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is of the very nature and essence of a lien, that no matter into whose hands the property goes, it passes cum onere”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.