Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Va. App. 19 - Yellardy v. Commonwealth

38 Va. App. 19 - Yellardy v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kirkpatrick v. Commonwealth · 26 Va. App. 1 - Archer v. Commonwealth · 20 Va. App. 133 - Sandoval v. Commonwealth · Satcher v. Commonwealth · Barrett v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A “common scheme or plan” exists when the “relationship among the offenses ... is dependent upon the existence of a plan that ties the offenses together and demonstrates that the objective of each offense was to contribute to the achievement of a goal not attainable by the commission of any of the individual offenses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.