38 Va. App. 773 - Sullivan v. Knick’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 23 Va. App. 690 - O'Loughlin v. O'Loughlin · 20 Va. App. 694 - Sargent v. Sargent · 15 Va. App. 575 - Hiner v. Hadeed · 2 Va. App. 571 - Scinaldi v. Scinaldi · 18 Va. App. 318 - Hughes v. Gentry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Code § 20-124.3 requires the trial court to identify the fundamental, predominating reason or reasons underlying its decision. This level of specificity does not require the chancellor to address all aspects of the decisionmaking process, as one would expect from comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Nor does the 1999 amendment require the chancellor “to quantify or elaborate exactly what weight or consideration it has given to each of the statutory factors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the instant record demonstrates few, if any, benefits to Kylie, a very young child, from relocation hundreds of miles from her father. To the contrary, the evidence clearly establishes that the move would disrupt the positive involvement and influence of father in Kylie’s life, a result at odds with her best interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.