38 Wash. 2d 624 - Rummer v. Throop’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2002
6 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp. · Stewart v. Larkin · Mackay v. Peterson · Rimling v. Scherper · Miraldi v. Wick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“were expressly referred to in the contract for sale sought to be rescinded. The lower court admitted evidence of the damage caused to the farm by the dust subsequent to the purchaser's taking possession, and rescinded the contract. On appeal the vendor argued that the evidence was inadmissible because the purchaser had both actual and constructive knowledge of the dust condition and therefore had no right to rely upon the vendor's oral representations. The Washington Supreme Court rejected this argument and affirmed, stating:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Where a representee makes only a partial investigation, and relies in part upon the representations of the adverse party, and is deceived by such representations, the authorities agree that he has a right to rely, and may maintain an action for such deceit. * * *" 231 P.2d at 319 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“involves the question of [the plaintiff's] diligence in ascertaining the facts for himself ... [and] his exercise of care and judgment in acting upon representations which run counter to knowledge within his possession or reach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Westby v. Gorsuch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.