38 Wash. App. 256 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Massiah v. United States · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · United States v. Henry · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Ohio State Board of Education v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Based on the trial court’s findings and our independent review of the record, ... the police in this case did not intentionally create a situation likely to induce the defendant to make incriminating statements, nor was there any deliberate and surreptitious interrogation of the defendant.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“likely to induce [Franklin] to make incriminating statements without the assistance of counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.