Turngren v. King County’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2002
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · United States v. Ventresca · Johnson v. United States · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The search warrant claimed to have been wrongfully issued was obtained by the defendant; 2. There was want of probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant; 3. The search warrant was obtained through malice; 4. The search of the plaintiff’s person, premises or property conducted pursuant to the search warrant was unsuccessful; and 5. The plaintiff suffered injury or damage as a result of the search. 686 P.2d at 1114 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clark v. Brown“. Nally v. Richmond, 105 Or. 462, 466-67 , 209 P. 871, 872-73 (1922). Although the Supreme Court of this State has not expressly defined a tort action based on the alleged wrongful issuance of a search warrant as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“" [cjonclusory allegations, speculative statements or argumentative assertions that unresolved factual matters remain are not sufficient to preclude an order of summary judgment."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.