Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Wash. App. 421 - State v. Martinez

38 Wash. App. 421 - State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · 99 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Hudlow · 28 Wash. App. 33 - State v. York · 112 Mich. App. 246 - People v. Redmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than 10 years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction, whichever is the later date, unless the court determines, in the interests of justice, that the probative value of the conviction supported by specific facts and circumstances substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect. However, evidence of a conviction more than 10 years old as calculated herein, is not admissible unless the proponent gives to the adverse party sufficient advance written notice of intent to use such evidence to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to contest the use of such evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “diminishing the importance of the victim's credibility to a determination of this case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.