Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 Wash. App. 600 - State v. Davis

38 Wash. App. 600 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
9
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably 119 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Ortiz (1992), State v. Easter (1996)

36 state decisions

1701984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Doyle v. Ohio · Oregon v. Hass · United States v. Hale · Fletcher v. Weir

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Adopting the position advanced by the State might also encourage police to delay reading Miranda warnings or to dispense with them altogether to preserve the opportunity to use the defendant’s silence against him. A constitutional guarantee designed to protect society from improper police conduct becomes meaningless when it may be obviated by law enforcement officials improperly withholding the Miranda warnings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]here is no logic in protecting a defendant advised of his rights and not an unadvised defendant. Both defendants are exercising the same constitutional right. The arrest itself is governmental action which enshrouds a defendant with the constitutional right to remain silent. A suspect’s fears upon arrest, combined with the widespread knowledge of the right to remain silent, will often result in the defendant remaining silent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.