Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 38 WIS 516 - De Forest v. Holum

De Forest v. Holum’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
June 1918
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1918

9 state decisions

4018751880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Failing the contingency, the whole purchase money was satisfied by the notes and mortgage; happening the contingency, another sum would then become purchase money, which before had formed no part of the purchase money.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.