Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

380 F.2d 376

Docket No. 9288.

Falgout v. Trujillo

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1967.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-07-05

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1971

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Falgout v. Trujillo

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-07-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Albert B. Dawkins, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

¶2Bert M. Keating, Theodore A. Bor-rillo and Thomas May, Denver, Colo., for appellees.

¶3Before LEWIS, HILL and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant, confined as a prisoner of the State of Colorado, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, raising the question of violation of his Constitutional rights. An able attorney was appointed to represent him there, an evidentiary hearing was had before Chief Judge Arraj and in a memorandum opinion the writ was denied. We have carefully reviewed the entire record and the denial is affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the opinion of the trial judge, reported in 270 F.Supp. 685, D.C.

/380/f2d/376 · .json · Public domain