Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

380 F.2d 735

Docket No. 21092.

Eduard Falks v. Willis H. Snyder

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-07-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-07-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John C. Dierking, Jr., Arriola, Bohn & Gayle, Allen A. Sekt, Agana, Guam, Arriola, Bohn & Gayle, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Harold W. Burnett, Atty. Gen., Richard D. Magee, Deputy Atty. Gen., Agana, Guam, for appellees.

Before POPE, JERTBERG, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Having examined the record and the briefs of counsel, we are satisfied that appellant failed to discharge his burden of showing that the by-law of the Guam Memorial Hospital specifying the requirements for appointment to its medical staff were arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory, or beyond the authority of the Board of Trustees.

¶2

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

/380/f2d/735 · .json · Public domain