Etheridge v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
380 F.2d 804 · 1967
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Davis (1978), United States v. Jacobs (1971)
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 1934 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Nardone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the facts obtained through the unlawful conduct do not become `sacred and inaccessible'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“knew it was unlawful to export [the contraband] from the United States”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Man
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.