Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 380 F.3d 416 - Gamradt

Gamradt’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2012
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on McCormack v. Hankscraft Company · Leannais v. Cincinnati, Inc. · Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. · Williams v. City of St. Louis · Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Manufacturers], however, fail to distinguish ordinary burning from the hot, rapid, smoky burning of which [the school district] presented evidence. This is a different, more serious, and more unexpected danger than that posed by ordinary flammable items. Such a danger is not obvious, and while [the school district] admitted knowing that [the mats] might burn, it indicated no knowledge of the speed or intensity with which they burned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.