Diaz v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
380 F.3d 480 · 2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · United States v. Turkette · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wages would be lower if, as alleged, the growers relied on a workforce consisting largely of undocumented workers, is a claim at least plausible enough to survive a motion to dismiss, whatever difficulty might arise in establishing how much lower the wages would be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“three-judge panel [had] tried to distinguish Mendoza on the theory that Diaz did not allege 'that he lost actual employment, only that he was rendered unable to pursue gainful employment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.