Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 380 F.3d 49 - Baron

Baron’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2023

1 federal appellate · 6 district ·

70200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Lawrence Greebel Richard Crane Brian Robinson John Ann Somers v. Ftp Software Inc · Kaufman v. Trump's Castle Funding · Aldridge v. A.T. Cross Corp. · In re Cabletron Systems Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is not a material omission to fail to point out information of which the market is already aware.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) [t]o employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud, (b) [t]o make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or (c) [t]o engage in any act, practice or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To state a claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities [Exchange] Act, a plaintiff must allege, inter alia , that a defendant '(A) made an untrue statement of a material fact; or (B) omitted to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.