Pridgen v. Shannon’s Empirical Analysis
380 F.3d 721 · 2004
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably Blystone v. Horn (2011), Herring v. United States (2005)
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Felker v. Turpin · Carey Warden v. Saffold · Salinger v. Loisel · McQueen v. Scroggy · Henry Fahy v. Martin Horn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in those instances in which the factual predicate of a petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion attacks the manner in which the earlier habeas judgment was procured and not the underlying conviction, the Rule 60(b) motion may be adjudicated on the merits. However, when the Rule 60(b) motion seeks to collaterally attack the petitioner’s underlying conviction, the motion should be treated as a successive habeas petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evans v. Pierce · Evans v. Pierce“[t]he court of appeals may authorize the filing of a second or successive application only if it determines that the application ... satisfies the [gatekeeping] requirements[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.