Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 380 F.3d 807 - John Doe # 1 v. Veneman

John Doe # 1 v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis

380 F.3d 807 · 2004

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
October 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Fiber Systems International, Inc. v. Roehrs (2006), Ward v. Santa Fe Independent School District (2004)

13 federal appellate ·

200200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Califano v. Yamasaki · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · Preiser v. Newkirk · United States v. IDAHO Ex Rel. DIRECTOR, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “narrowly tailor[ed] ... to remedy the specific action which gives rise to the order.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the scope of injunctive relief is dictated by the extent of the violation established.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The broadness of an injunction refers to the range of proscribed activity .... [and] is a matter of substantive law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.