Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 380 F.3d 83 - Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino

Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino’s Empirical Analysis

380 F.3d 83 · 2004

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
4
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably Lugosch III v. Pyramid Company of Onondaga Llc (2006), JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Altos Hornos De Mexico, S.A de C.V. (2005)

31 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

630200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Younger v. Harris · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Burford v. Sun Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “have historically been open to the press and general public”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In general, we refrain from analyzing issues not decided below.”). 4 . Rule 8001 was amended effective October 17, 2005, but the new provisions do not affect this case in any way. 5 . Rule 9006”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “considers the extent to which the judicial documents are 'derived from or [are] a necessary corollary of the capacity to attend ... relevant proceedings'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.