Rueda v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
380 F.3d 831 · 2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Pareja v. Attorney General of the United States (2010), De La Vega v. Gonzales (2006)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moosa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Mendez-Moranchel v. Ashcroft · Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft · Garcia-Melendez v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exceptional and extremely unusual hardship”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.