380 N.J. Super. 94 - Rac v. Pjs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vidrio-Aleman v. United States · Lopez v. Swyer · Bak-A-Lum Corp. of America v. Alcoa Building Products, Inc. · Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc. · O'KEEFFE v. Snyder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“application of the doctrine of equitable tolling in this case [did] not undermine the purposes of the Parentage Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rac v. Pjs, Jr.“two fixed and specified events, i.e., the birth of the child and the child's attainment of the age of majority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rac v. Pjs, Jr.“No action shall be brought under [the Act] more than 5 years after the child attains the age of majority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rac v. Pjs, Jr.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.