Santos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2018
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 245 So. 2d 225 - State v. Ashby · Hand v. State · 356 So. 2d 276 - State v. Lee · Knight & Wall Company v. Bryant · Lee v. Bigby Electric Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every law shall embrace but one subject and matter properly connected therewith, and the subject shall be briefly expressed in the title.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“article III, section 6, does not require sections of the Florida Statutes to conform to the single subject requirement. The requirement applies to `laws' in the sense of acts of the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.