State v. Menne’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 410 So. 2d 1019 - State v. Willie (1982), 105 Ill. App. 3d 1023 - People v. Savory (1982)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Mathiason · Beckwith v. United States · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · Mathis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any formulation making the need for Miranda warnings depend upon how each individual being questioned perceived his situation would require a prescience neither the police nor any one else possesses. On the other hand, a standard hinging on the inner intentions of the police would fail to recognize Miranda's concern with the coercive effect of the `atmosphere' from the point of view of the person being questioned.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a citizen was deprived of his liberty in a significant way or was not free to go as he pleased.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“... rash indeed to suppose that he was free to leave ... if he pleased.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sumler · State v. Obney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.