Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 380 So. 2d 59 - State v. Thibodeaux

380 So. 2d 59 - State v. Thibodeaux’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square (1983), 424 So. 2d 246 - State Ex Rel. Elaire v. Blackburn (1982)

30 state decisions

901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 337 So. 2d 1090 - State v. Turner · 357 So. 2d 517 - State v. Simmons · State v. Egena

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the court finds that the verdict is incorrect in form or is not responsive to the indictment, it shall refuse to receive it, and shall remand the jury with the necessary oral instructions. In such a case the court shall read the verdict, and record the reasons for refusal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whenever the credibility of a witness is to be impeached by proof of any statement made by him contradictory to his testimony, he must first be asked whether he has made such statement, and his attention must be called to the time, place and circumstances, and to the person to whom the alleged statement was made, in order that the witness may have an opportunity of explaining that which is prima facie contradictory. If the witness does not distinctly admit making such statement, evidence that he did make it is admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Guilty. Guilty of attempted production, manufacture, distribution or dispensation of controlled dangerous substances. Guilty of possession of controlled dangerous substances. Guilty of attempted possession of controlled dangerous | nsubstances. Not guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.